Odds & Ends

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Guided MIFFile
(Can I pass off my appalling MIFF puns as a tribute to the bad puns of old cartoon titles? No? Oh.)

Well, I've finished MIFF with three films back-to-back this afternoon; all good (or at least enjoyable), thankfully. I also saw two on Friday. So I might as well wrap them up briefly while the thoughts are fresh.

Persepolis (Marjana Satrapi), 2007

I'll do a fuller review of this in the next week or so (hopefully), so more on this later. But suffice to say it's brilliant, and you absolutely should see it when it comes out.

Encounters at the End of the World (Werner Herzog), 2007

I didn't dislike this to the same extent Mark Lavercombe at Hoopla did, but it was disappointing. Sharing more than a little in common with Herzog's earlier science-fiction / documentary / head-scratcher The Wild Blue Yonder (which I covered at a previous MIFF, see here), it sees Herzog travel to Antarctica to talk to various research scientists. Herzog is, of course, an eccentric of long standing, and sometimes (most recently in Grizzly Man) his off-kilter perspective can be strangely brilliant. Here, though, he generally comes across as foolish. He has some interesting interview subjects, and certainly gets some great footage in the scenes of diving under ice (it's here the film resembles Wild Blue Yonder - it may even reuse some of the same footage). But he consistently seems the least intelligent person in the room: his narration ruminates on humanity's relationship with the environment, but his interview subjects are vastly more informed than he is on the topic. Funny, often beautiful, and Herzog is never a waste of time; but there's a sense that Herzog is resting on his laurels as one of the great documentarians, rather than really chasing down a great story as he did back in Grizzly Man.

Dead-End Drive-In (Brain Trenchard-Smith), 1986

I'm surprised this isn't better remembered as a guilty pleasure in the same way Trenchard-Smith's earlier BMX Bandits is. A strange half-cousin of Mad Max, it is set in a lawless near-future Australia where the government has turned drive-in cinemas into ad-hoc prisons. It's a nutty but fun premise, and the film is actually pretty good in a trashy kind of way. What really kills it are the terrible performances: George Miller had Mel Gibson and Steve Bisley, while Trenchard-Smith has to make do with Ned Manning and Wilbur Wilde. Wilde, in particular, gives a horrendous performance that will leave you in no doubt why, when the producers of Houseboat Horror were looking to cast a Hey Hey It's Saturday band member, they went for Animal. The silliness of the premise and amateurishness of the cast separates it from the professionalism George Miller's series, and maybe there was no room commercially for a knock-off like this once Miller had taken that series to the heights he did in Mad Max 2. But still, Trenchard-Smith deserves kudos for a really good job with the camera. The film looks great, making excellent use of location in its early stretches and milking the limited stunt budget for all it's worth. There's some ham-fisted commentary about racism that, while out of place, is interesting for foreshadowing what John Howard would do to the country (this was released two years before Howard's 1988 comments about Asian immigration).

Roadgames (Richard Franklin), 1981

This one's reputation preceded it, and did not disappoint. I knew Franklin was a very capable crafstman from his work on the surprisingly good Psycho II, and here he also has a witty, clever script courtesy of Everett De Roche. The film follows the cat-and-mouse games of a truck-driver, Quid, (Stacey Keach) who becomes convinced the driver of a van he's sharing the road with is a serial killer. What I enjoyed was the amount of humour injected through Keach's character, and the extent to which Franklin and de Roche keep you guessing despite apparently having tipped their hand right at the start. They continuously pay-off scenes against your expectations, and the ambiguity about whether Quid is right, or if he has misidentified the killer and has actually become a rogue truck driver (a la Duel) is maintained until surprisingly late in the proceedings.

Idiots and Angels (Bill Plympton), 2008

Bill Plympton's grimly compelling parable is a return to form compared to his last feature, the disappointing Hair High. Dialogueless, it tells the story of an apparently immoral man who wakes up one morning with wings on his back; they seem to want him to use his life for good, but he's having none of it. Plympton is purportedly the only animator ever to animate an entire feature himself, and he has made an art out of creative use of labour saving devices such as still frames and repeated cycles (even where there is movement, I doubt he's using more than a few drawings a second). Yet while his staccato animation is occasionally jarring, it allows him to fully develop his incredibly strong visual sense, and to not compromise his vision. This is a lot darker than my previous favourite film of Plympton's, his debut feature The Tune, but it retains an underlying sense of humour and a fascination with grotesque bodily distortions.

Labels: , ,


Comments
Comments can be made on the individual post's page.

Monday, July 30, 2007

MIFF Report, Part I
A good start to MIFF this year, with two enjoyable sessions on the weekend. Before I get to my reports, though, it is worth noting that Paul Martin is keeping what looks to be a very helpful running list of films that are nearly sold out.

The Best of Norman McLaren

I had thought this retrospective of Canadian animator Norman McLaren might be the cinematic equivalent of eating my greens, but this was unexpectedly enjoyable. This selection of McLaren's films alternated between highly abstract animation and little comic skits done in a semi-animated style using human bodies. I'm not usually keen on abstract films, as the lack of any meaningful framework in which to assess the work leaves the artist completely unaccountable to the audience (who can ever say whether the work is of any merit?) Yet McLaren's work defied my expectations, especially surprising given that one long slog is hardly the way to appreciate this kind of film. The shorts are remarkable for the level of energy and inventiveness they achieve in an intrinsically painstaking artform: the earliest of the shorts, Stars and Stripes, felt so contemporary in its confrontational explosion of movement and colour that it was hard to believe it was from 1941 (some sources list it as 1940 or even 1939). Other highlights included Blinkety Blank and the jazzy Begone Dull Care, but the really startling film is the last, Pas de deux. It starts as a simple shot of a ballet dancer, with occasional freeze frames to give a Nude-Descending-A-Staircase kind of look, but becomes steadily more beautiful as it progresses. It left me seriously contemplating the Norman McLaren DVD set.



Rescue Dawn (Werner Herzog)

Werner Herzog's Rescue Dawn is one of his most mainstream efforts: a prisoner-of-war movie (from a true story) about US navy pilot Dieter Dengler's escape from a POW camp during the Vietnam War. It's pretty conventional material - even star Christian Bale has been here before, in Empire of the Sun - but it's very well done. The performances - from Bale, and also Steve Zahn and Jeremy Davies as fellow prisoners - are extremely solid, and Herzog's eye for the landscape is as good as you'd expect. (I'm just glad someone had the courage to let Herzog film in a jungle again after Fitzcarraldo). It falls a bit short of greatness, though: there are enough little moments of eccentricity that you can feel it's a Herzog film, but not enough of that really off-kilter sensibility to lift it to quite the level of his best work. Last year's MIFF offering from Herzog, The Wild Blue Yonder, was a much less successful film but showed more hints of something truly brilliant (and Herzog has been wonderful as recently as 2005's Grizzly Man). Still, it's well worth catching when it gets its mainstream release, and should be Herzog's first really successful fictional film in years. It screens again at MIFF on 4 August.

Labels: , ,


Comments
Comments can be made on the individual post's page.
Sunday, August 06, 2006

MIFF Week One
We're about halfway through the Melbourne International Film Festival now, and my own experience has been only average. This isn't a reflection on the festival: it's just the way the cards have fallen in the vast lucky dip that happens when you have to choose from a range of movies before the usual pre-release buzz. (It's a little frightening to realise how much you rely on distributors and the media to direct your viewing).

My experience so far has been of several middling films, one good one, and one really wretched one. Which is probably a strike-rate reflecting the overall quality of any given sample of movies. But I do hope the second week throws me up something really excellent. But here's what I've seen so far.

A Scanner Darkly (Richard Linklater)

Linklater's sort-of animated film is an adaptation of a Phillip K Dick novel, about an undercover cop in near future California who comes off second best from his own addiction. I haven't read the source novel, but I've read enough of Dick to know that Linklater's film is a much more faithful adaptation of Dick's vision than the typical Hollywood takes on his work (Bladerunner, total Recall, Minority Report, etc). Which is both a strength and a weakness. It has the slightly alienating quality of Dick's writing down pat: lots of great ideas, but an off-putting disregard for character and narrative. The "animated" technique Linklater uses (which is actually little more than a really extreme cinematography, since we're seeing live-action actors disguised to look animated) is a bit of a needless gimmick.
Not bad, but not great.

The Pervert's Guide to Cinema (Sophie Fiennes)

I thought this presentation of Lacanian film theorist Slavoj Zizek's theories might be interesting. I've recently been reading Noel Carroll's great book Mystifying Movies, in which he comprehensively destroys old-school Lacanian film theory, so I was wondering whether an "academic rock star" who proclaims himself Lacanian might have moved into more interesting areas. Nope. Zizek's presentation is fun enough, but it's just the standard Lacanian melange of dubious psychoanalytical conceits applied haphazardly to various films, without any attempt to shape it into a theoretical model that is either useful or convincing. It's like listening to the most annoying person in your first year film studies course (the one who had read ahead into the psychonalytical film theory and absorbed it wholeale without ever critiquing it). Still, it is fun to watch the clips and see Zizek putter about Bodega Bay (from The Birds) in a motor boat. Incidentally, The MIFF organisers get a black mark for programming what seemed to be three episodes of a TV series into one 150 minute slog and trying to pretend it was an actual movie. Not good enough: it's not fair to the material, or the audience (if I'd known it wasn't intended as a feature I definitely would have seen something else).

The Wild Blue Yonder (Werner Herzog)

I was trying to think whether there is any director who is so esteemed as both a director of fiction and documentary as Werner Herzog: even allowing that it is a long time since his really highly regarded fictional work (Fitzcarraldo, Aguirre: The Wrath of God, etc) I couldn't come up with anyone. The Wild Blue Yonder blends both sides of his work, using an on-screen narrator (a wild-eyed Brad Dourif) to tell a science fiction story that is illustrated with various bits of out-of-context documentary footage. For a while it's really fun: some of Herzog's editorial choices are inspired and funny, and the segments with Dourif (particularly the visit to the alien's "city") show Herzog's eye for finding weird real world locations hasn't dulled since Stroszek. In its second half, however, Herzog pretty much just settles down to giving us documentary footage (of NASA astronauts and deep sea divers) with musical accompaniment. He's obviously trying to transform the footage into a 2001-esque mood piece, but at the end of the day it's still just footage with music over it.

Fearless (Ronny Yu)

My favorite bit of the Festival program is the spiel in very fine print on director Ronny Yu's career under the listing for Fearless: "His films include... Freddy vs Jason." Well, the new film from the director of Freddy vs Jason has got subtitles, so it must be art, right? Well, maybe. But it is fun. Fearless continues the post-Crouching Tiger trend of big-budget, prestige kung fu movies that are partially American backed and aiming for arthouse distribution in the west. Yu is no match for directors such as Ang Lee and Zhang Yimou who have directed previous efforts along these lines, but he does have Jet Li, who is in good form here as both a performer and a kung fu artist. I was attracted to this because the program offered a "return to the classic, stripped-back kung fu style typified by the early films of Jackie Chan and Jet Li." It isn't really that like early Chan - there's still a little bit of wire work and a few unnecessary bullet-time like camera moves - but it certainly is back to basics when compared to something like Kung Fu Hustle. The fights are pretty good, the story involving enough, and Yu manages to make the whole thing feel nice and epic, with attractive locations, sets, and production design. A lot of fun.

Tidelands (Terry Gilliam)

I really hated this movie. It isn't reprehensible, or stupid, or otherwise bad in any of the usual ways. It just doesn't work at all. It tells the story of small girl, the daughter of junkie parents, who ends up faring for herself in an empty farmhouse, eventually befriending a pair of eccentric neighbours. There's a really good idea in the way the film reflects her deteriorating mental health by exploring her inner life and showing her play becoming increasingly warped and unhealthy. Unfortunately, it's just about unwatchable despite beautiful cinematography and Gilliam's good eye. The first half, in which we watch the girl play and share in her elaborate fantasy world, has its grotesque elements but mixes them withy a syrupy whimsy that recalls Spielberg at his worst. It's slow and very dull. The second half livens up, but becomes increasingly difficult to watch as it delves into some really morbid humour and issues of inappropriate sexual relationships that it doesn't know how to resolve. It all adds up to a miserable experience. I can't see who the audience for this is, and find it difficult to imagine it getting a release.

Labels: , , , , ,


Comments
Comments can be made on the individual post's page.

Back to Cinephobia Main Page


This page is for assorted musings and editorialising that don't fit elsewhere on Cinephobia.


Want to contact me?
Click here



Become a fan on Facebook






Google