Odds & Ends
Saturday, June 24, 2006
Star Trek: Rebooted
Ain't It Cool brought my attention to this post by writer Bryce Zabel about the treatment he wrote with Babylon 5 creator J. Michael Straczynski to "re-boot" Star Trek. You should read the treatment yourself, if you're interested, but basically it involved starting from scratch, and doing a new television series about the original characters (Kirk, Spock, et al) on their five year voyage. Effectively, it's giving Star Trek the Batman Begins treatment, which seems all the rage these days (what with Superman Returns and Casino Royale both on the way). As described by Straczynski and Zabel, it's a fascinating idea. What really struck me was that whereas very other Trek incarnation has based the franchise around the universe (so that each new series covers different periods and events in a consistent chronology), this one bases everything around the original series characters and throws everything else out. In other words, the key to Trek is defined as being Kirk, Spock, McCoy and the rest, just as other franchises rotate around - and occasionally recast and reimagine - their lead characters (Superman, Batman, James Bond, etc). As interesting as it would have been to see this, at the end of the day I don't really buy it. Firstly, Kirk is William Shatner and Spock is Leonard Nimoy and Bones is DeForest Kelley. Those characters were defined by the actors who played them - often because the writing was pretty thin, frankly - and I don't think it would be a very productive exercise recasting them. (I think J.J. Abrams' mooted "young Kirk" project is a doomed exercise for much the same reason). The other thing is that for all Straczynski and Zabel's optimism about a "fresh take" on the format, I'm just not sure there's much more that can be done with the "starship cruising the universe" format. There have been an incredible twenty-nine series of Trek all up (including the animated series), which have picked over a lot of narrative ground. If you've watched a series or two of Trek, you've seen a lot of variations on pretty much every kind of story you can build into that format. As I alluded to in my review of Star Trek: Nemesis, I think the future of Trek lies in taking a break, letting demand build, and then returning with a decently budgeted feature film that had some real scope to it. Given the series some real grandeur and mystique, rather than having it constantly accessible in multiple versions that retread the original format, would be a much better way to "reboot." ...While I'm on Star Trek, there is one other thing I wanted to post - with a quick disclaimer. Below is a link to Master Replica's reproduction of the original Enterprise model, which you can click for more details. The disclaimer is that yes, this is obviously an ad. But I only get money if you buy it, not just for clicking through, and given the obscene cost (too horrific to repeat here) I wouldn't advocate you doing so. But if you're a Trek fan you should click it and salivate a little. I'm in nerd nirvana when I look at that thing. While I'm not a huge fan of the original series of Trek, I love the design of the original Enterprise. One of my fondest memories of my trip to Washington DC in 2002 was coming across the original TV model in a glass case at the back of the Air and Space Museum gift shop. It really is an amazing site, and was - embarrassingly - the highlight of the museum for me. (Wright Flyer? Bah!) So when is Lego going to sign a Star Trek licence? A Lego Starship Enterprise would go beautifully with their Imperial Star Destroyer. There is this thing:   But unfortunately it's actually made from Megablocks, the Lego for parents who don't love their children. Labels: rumours Posted by Stephen Rowley @ 24.6.06  
Comments:
<< Home
Love your work! Top notch site, can't believe i haven't found it sooner.
Post a Comment
Your articles are highly informative and enthralling to my psyche. Mega blocks are something that my parents bought me when i was a child and i have suffered every day since. May they burn in hell. Your admirer Yeti |
This page is for assorted musings and editorialising that don't fit elsewhere on Cinephobia. At Least It Isn't Speedy vs Daffy Clampett vs. Jones World Trade Centre It's My Movie, I'll Destroy It If I Want To Han to Shoot First Once More Trailer Watch The Funniest Cartoon Ever? Not the Sequel to Martin Scorsese's Casino This Isn't My Site December 2003 May 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 November 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 June 2006 August 2006 September 2006 October 2006 December 2006 January 2007 February 2007 March 2007 April 2007 May 2007 June 2007 July 2007 August 2007 September 2007 October 2007 December 2007 January 2008 February 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 Want to contact me? |
